We voiced the opinion after last years election that there was electronic voting fraud going on and that Bushco probably stole the election by hijacking Ohio. Well, guess what? It seems John Kerry feels the same way. While rigging an election would take an immense conspriacy, you have to wonder if the pre-election polls predicted Ohio as the key state, and the Republicans focused on that state to tamper with. Because of the Electoral College, we have the winner-take-all system. Meaning if there are one or two states that by themselves would swing the election one way or the other, and that state is close, and that state is tampered with . . . you know where I'm going with this. Doesn't it bother anyone that immediately after reelection W's polls went straight back down? By all measurable data he was losing the election on tuesday. But then something happened. What? Luck? Fraud? Vote tampering? Something happened. If W was so beloved, his ratings would be higher. How else do you explain an unpopular president being reelected? Didn't the GAO report last week confirm there were numerous irregularities in the Ohio election?
Oh yeah, the so called "liberal" media missed that story entirely.
If anyone thinks a closed-source, Windows access based system with modems attached was not used to manipulate votes during the election you are retarded. It would take a fourteen year old about three minutes to flip Ohio from Kerry to Bush. And the people running the show know that anyone who mentioned this possibility would be immediately labeled a "crack pot", despite it being obvious to anyone who knows anything about computers. SOMEONE dialed into the Ohio Diebold computers from outside THREE TIMES during the counting process. Is there anyone out there who can say they are comfortable with that? Cheaper, much more secure voting machines with voter verified paper audit trails have been demoed over and over - but the poeple in power don't want to buy them. It's not in either parties [dem/reps] direct interest to have 100% secure voting systems.

Exit polls showed Kerry winning solidly.
Exit polls have accurately predicted the winner in every presidential election in the last fifty years.

In every place where the exit polls were wrong:

1) The state was a battleground state.
2) The exit polls showed Kerry beating Bush, but the final vote count showed Bush winning.
3) Voting was carried out by electronic, paper trail-less voting machines.

Voting machines that left a paper trail showed the same results as exit polls in those areas. Non-electric machines showed the same results as exit polls. The Ukrainian election last year was deemed fraudulent by the international community because of a discrepancy between the exit poll results and the official results.

Let's play a little game I call "Which is more ridiculous?"

1. 62,040,606 American voters actually voted for the guy who can't even form a coherent sentance.
2. Less than 62,040,606 voted for him and there was some fraud somewhere in the many thousands of polling offices around the country.
I'll say number two is the more reasonable proposition.

Not the first stolen election (see 1960 in Illinois) and it will not the be the last. I'm pretty sure Bush had at least some influence on the voting results, and quite possibly stole one if not both of the elections. However, that doesn't get him out now. He's in, and we can't go back in time and give Gore or Kerry the Oval Office. All we can do now is press for election reform to prevent it from happening again.
Kerry knows the election was stolen.
He is in the same secret society with the guy that stole it. Does no one understand both candidates are related and part of the same secret Yale society, brought in two years apart to a club that brings in only 15 members a year? Who in their right mind would believe this shit?
Either way, George W. Bush is clearly too incomptent, intellectually and ethically deficient, and pampered to adequately serve as President, and so are the vast majority of other Republicans. But I don't know why people are making such a big deal about voter fraud. The Electoral college elects the president, based on suggestions by the Freemasons, Rand Corp., and the Elders of Zion.